ORDER NOW
Print
$2,750.00
Single-site or operational unit license
$3,500.00
Country license
$4,200.00
Country or Global license
Contact David Cunningham,
Account Manager,
781-972-5472
cunningham@
healthtech.com
Length
236 pages
Date published
October 2005
Additional info
Single-site, country, and global licenses are multi-user, searchable, and cut-and-paste ready PDFs delivered by e-mail.
Pharmaceutical R&D Productivity:
The Path to Innovation
Bryan G. Reuben, M.A.,
M.Sc., D.Phil. and Michael L. Burstall, M.A., M.Sc., D.Phil
Table
1.1. New Active Substances and New Molecular Entities
Table 1.2. R&D Expenditures by Selected Companies, 2004
Table 2.1. Advantages and Drawbacks of Matrix Management
Table 2.2. How Bristol-Myers Squibb Turned Around
Table 2.3. How Ruffalo Turned Wyeth Around
Table 2.4. Hassan’s Recipe for Reorganization
Table 3.1. Drop-off in Sales with Rank Order
Table 4.1. Platform Technologies and the Tasks They Perform
Table 4.2. Sales of Recombinant Drugs Exceeding $550 Million in 2004
Table 5.1. David Graham’s Targets
Table 5.2. Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty (SHAC)
Table 5.3. The TRIPS Agreement
Table 5.4. Controls on Pharmaceutical Pricing and Reimbursement in
the Major Markets, 2004
Table 6.1. GlaxoSmithKline Patent Expirations
Table 7.1. Sanofi-Aventis Patent Expirations
Figure 1.1. Number of NMEs and Biotech Products Approved, 1994-2004
Figure 1.2. World Pharmaceutical Market Share by Region, 1990 and
2003
Figure 1.3. Sales Percentages of New Medicines Marketed, 1998-2002
Figure 1.4. World Pharmaceutical Research Expenditures by Region,
1990 and 2001
Figure 1.5. Average Number of New Active Substances per Year by Region,
1975-2004
Figure 1.6. R&D Expenditures (×10) and Sales of Pharmaceuticals
in the U.S., 1970-2003
Figure 1.7. Ratio of R&D Expenditures to Sales in the U.S., 1970-2003
Figure 1.8. Investment Required for One Successful Drug Launch, 1995
Figure 1.9. Pharmaceutical R&D Employment, U.S. and Europe, 1985-2003
Figure 1.10. Allocation of Costs for Select Pharmaceutical Companies,
2004
Figure 1.11. Slowing U.S. Pharmaceutical Market Growth, 1994-2004
Figure 1.12. Proportion of Pharmaceutical Sales from Blockbusters,
2003
Figure 1.13. Drug Pipelines and Market Share of Various Companies,
2003
Figure 2.1. Schmooklerian and Conventional Linear Models of Innovation
Figure 2.2. A Hierarchical Management Structure
Figure 2.3. A Matrix Management Structure
Figure 2.4. Total Quality Control
Figure 2.5. Delayering and Increasing Span of Control in Company
Structure
Figure 2.6. Main Decision Points in the Development of a New Drug
Figure 2.7. Reasons for Failure of a Drug to Enter Clinical Trials
Figure 3.1. Sales Revenues vs. Rank, Top Pharma Companies, 1985-2004
Figure 3.2. Wyeth Mergers and Acquisitions, 1986-2004
Figure 3.3. Novartis Mergers and Acquisitions, 1986-2004
Figure 3.4. Sanofi-Aventis Mergers and Acquisitions, 1986-2004
Figure 3.5. Pfizer Mergers and Acquisitions, 1986-2004
Figure 3.6. GlaxoSmithKline Mergers and Acquisitions, 1986-2004
Figure 3.7. Bristol-Myers Squibb Mergers and Acquisitions, 1986-2004
Figure 3.8. Roche Mergers and Acquisitions, 1986-2004
Figure 3.9. AstraZeneca Mergers and Acquisitions, 1986-2004
Figure 3.10. Johnson & Johnson Mergers and Acquisitions, 1986-2004
Figure 3.11. Pharma Company Takeovers and Mergers by Year, 1986-2004
Figure 3.12. Glaxo and SmithKline Beecham Employees
Figure 4.1. Combinatorial Chemistry for Lead Generation
Figure 4.2. Biopharmaceutical Pharmaceutical Companies with Initial
Equity Financing,
1992-2005
Figure 4.3. Big Pharma Edges Into Big Molecules
Figure 5.1. The Telescoped Model of Innovation
Figure 5.2. Prescriptions for COX-2 Inhibitors by Month in the United
Kingdom, 2000-2005
Figure 6.1. Effect of GlaxoSmithKline Patent Expirations on Future
Revenues
Figure 6.2. GlaxoSmithKline Pipeline, 2000-2004
Figure 7.1. Effect of Sanofi-Aventis Patent Expirations on Future
Revenues
Appendix A: Abbreviations
Appendix B: Analysis of the Patent Activities of Top Companies and
Universities in the Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology Sectors
"CHI's Insight
Pharma Reports are
a cost-effective and reliable source
of information about the markets
we serve. The cost
for us to conduct
this kind of business
research on our
own would be
prohibitive. CHI's
Insight Pharma
Reports allow us to
keep on top of
developments in
this rapidly moving
field."
--Donald N. Halbert, Ph.D., EVP of R&D, Iconix Biosciences
A division of
Cambridge
Healthtech Institute